Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] TQMx86: TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x MFD/GPIO support

[Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 10:20 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2021, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> 
> > Updated patch series:
> > 
> > - A number of new patches (more hardware support and a few fixes)
> > - Patches 1-3 have gained Fixes tags
> > - Patch 2 depends on 1, so maybe we can push the GPIO patch through the
> >   MFD tree to keep them together?
> > - The change in patch 7 was somewhat controversial. I've added a
> >   warning, but it is the last patch of the series, so it doesn't affect
> >   the rest of the series if it is rejected.
> > 
> > 
> > Matthias Schiffer (7):
> >   gpio: tqmx86: really make IRQ optional
> >   mfd: tqmx86: clear GPIO IRQ resource when no IRQ is set
> >   mfd: tqmx86: remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID
> >   mfd: tqmx86: fix typo in "platform"
> >   mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQMx110EB and TQMxE40x
> >   mfd: tqmx86: add support for TQ-Systems DMI IDs
> >   mfd: tqmx86: assume 24MHz LPC clock for unknown boards
> > 
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-tqmx86.c |  6 ++---
> >  drivers/mfd/tqmx86.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Patches look good.
> 
> Could you please collect up Andrew's acks, remove the suggested Fixes:
> lines and resubmit please?

Are you referring to the Fixes: line in "[PATCH v2 3/7] mfd: tqmx86:
remove incorrect TQMx90UC board ID"?

> 
> I'll quickly apply them once resent (probably Monday - if you get them
> out today).
> 

Thanks, I'll try to get it done today.