Re: [libgpiod] How stable is the v2 API?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:16:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:09 AM Ben Hutchings
> <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'm working on a project that requires GPIO debouncing and is planned
> > to use libgpiod.  But debouncing is only available on the unreleased
> > next/libgpiod-2.0 branch.
> >
> > What we'd like to know is whether the current C API on that branch is
> > expected to change much before release.  I don't expect any commitment
> > to API or ABI stability, but it would be helpful to have some
> > indication of how much change is likely to be needed in a client that
> > is written for the current API.
> 
> I believe this is the right thread to discuss and influence if needed.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20210621191830.10628-1-brgl@xxxxxxxx/T/#ma70b1ab80804c09644f4a018ff5eff10464b195a

Thanks.  I've actually seen that already.  I don't think I need to
exert any "influence" as the current v2 API seems to do cover our
needs.

Ben.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux