On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 02:23:49PM +0200, Matthias Schiffer wrote: > No TQMx90UC exists at the moment, and it is undecided whether ID 10 will > be used eventually (and if it is, how that SoM will be named). This was in the vendor code i was given. I just blindly kept it, since i don't know anything except about the one system i had. > Fixes: 2f17dd34ffed ("mfd: tqmx86: IO controller with I2C, Wachdog and GPIO") I'm not sure this meets the stable requirements: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/stable-kernel-rules.html Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> Andrew