Hello, While trying to debug an IRQ handling issue on a sifive-unmatched board (which is a very recent board on a recent architecture, so I would not be overly surprised if there were bugs in hiding), I realised that I was able to claim via sysfs GPIO pins which are being actively used as IRQ sources. Checking drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c and kernel/irq/chip.c, I believe this is because gpiolib (gpiochip_irq_reqres, gpiochip_reqres_irq, gpiochip_lock_as_irq) does not call gpiod_request_{,commit}, resulting in a pin which is available for use. I could confirm this by adding (just as a debugging aid): WARN_ON(!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags)); early in gpiochip_lock_as_irq, and this statement gets triggered. Is this intentional ? Does this requesting belong to something else in the codepath from request_threaded_irq (and similar) ? Could it be something missing in the devicetree for this board ? Also, I notice that both gpiochip_hierarchy_add_domain and gpiochip_reqres_irq call gpiochip_lock_as_irq, and I am surprised I do not get any error about this: in my understanding only the first call on a given pin should succeed, but with my WARN_ON I am seeing both stack traces and no other warning. FWIW, my builds are based on vanilla 5.13-rc6. Regards, -- Vincent Pelletier