Hi, On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:27:22AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote: > match could be NULL in which case we do not go ACPI after all > > Signed-off-by: Henning Schild <henning.schild@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c > index 85750974d182..dca17bb76cac 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c > @@ -1601,12 +1601,12 @@ const struct intel_pinctrl_soc_data *intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data(struct platform_ > const struct intel_pinctrl_soc_data *data = NULL; > const struct intel_pinctrl_soc_data **table; > struct acpi_device *adev; > + const void *match; > unsigned int i; > > adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev); > - if (adev) { > - const void *match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); > - > + match = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); Actually we don't even call intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data() if the ACPI ID is not listed in the corresponding driver's module table. So I don't think match can ever be NULL. But feel free to prove me wrong ;-)