Hi Rob,
On 1.6.2021 16.32, Rob Herring wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:13:32 +0300, Mauri Sandberg wrote:
Add documentation for a general GPIO multiplexer.
Signed-off-by: Mauri Sandberg <maukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3 -> v4:
- Changed author email
- Included Tested-by and Reviewed-by from Drew
v2 -> v3: added a complete example on dual 4-way multiplexer
v1 -> v2: added a little bit more text in the binding documenation
---
.../bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.yaml | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.yaml
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/mux-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['gpio-mux']
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.example.dt.yaml: key-mux1: 'mux-controls' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.example.dt.yaml: key-mux2: 'mux-controls' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mux-input.yaml
These look like they could be caused by gpio-mux bindings [2], which
this depends on, not being formulated in yaml. Should it be addressed
before carrying on?
Thanks,
Mauri
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mux/gpio-mux.txt
