On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 9:59 AM Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back > the private information. > Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it. > > If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on > devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as > there are other ways to log/see this during probe. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c > index 10d3597e9ac2..f54ae9d4254a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c > @@ -741,13 +741,7 @@ static int tegra186_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > offset += port->pins; > } > > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio); > - > - err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gpio, gpio); > - if (err < 0) > - return err; > - > - return 0; > + return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &gpio->gpio, gpio); > } > > #define TEGRA186_MAIN_GPIO_PORT(_name, _bank, _port, _pins) \ > -- > 2.31.1 > Normally I'd wait for Thierry's Ack but this cleanup is pretty straightforward so I applied both patches. Bart