On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It seems the ordering is by name. Keep it that way. > Here updating the entire list (there were two more options not in order). > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Patch applied! Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name (part 2)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name (part 2)
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:31:19 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20210510194717.12255-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20210510194717.12255-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name (part 2)
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name (part 2)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] bitmap: Make bitmap_remap() and bitmap_bitremap() available to users
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop duplicate offset check in gpiochip_is_requested()
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: Keep enum pin_config_param ordered by name (part 2)
- Next by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Drop duplicate offset check in gpiochip_is_requested()
- Index(es):
 |