Am Montag, 10. Mai 2021, 08:37:34 CEST schrieb Jianqun Xu: > There has spin lock for irq set type already, so drop irq_gc_lock and > irq_gc_unlock. > > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I've looked that up, and yes the irq_gc_lock stuff really seems to be redundant when there is already another spinlock in place, so Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio/rockchip: drop irq_gc_lock/irq_gc_unlock for irq set type
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio/rockchip: drop irq_gc_lock/irq_gc_unlock for irq set type
- From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:26:42 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20210510063734.506063-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
- References: <20210510063602.505829-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> <20210510063734.506063-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v4 0/7] gpio-rockchip driver
- From: Jianqun Xu
- [PATCH 7/7] gpio/rockchip: drop irq_gc_lock/irq_gc_unlock for irq set type
- From: Jianqun Xu
- [PATCH v4 0/7] gpio-rockchip driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/7] gpio/rockchip: use struct rockchip_gpio_regs for gpio controller
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] gpio/rockchip: always enable clock for gpio controller
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 7/7] gpio/rockchip: drop irq_gc_lock/irq_gc_unlock for irq set type
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] gpio-rockchip driver
- Index(es):
 |