[PATCH] gpio: gpio-sta2x11: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
the private information.
Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.

If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
there are other ways to log/see this during probe.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-sta2x11.c | 10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sta2x11.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sta2x11.c
index a74bb97a41e2..392fcab06ab8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sta2x11.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sta2x11.c
@@ -398,15 +398,7 @@ static int gsta_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 		return err;
 	}
 
-	err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&dev->dev, &chip->gpio, chip);
-	if (err < 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->dev, "sta2x11 gpio: Can't register (%i)\n",
-			-err);
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	platform_set_drvdata(dev, chip);
-	return 0;
+	return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&dev->dev, &chip->gpio, chip);
 }
 
 static struct platform_driver sta2x11_gpio_platform_driver = {
-- 
2.31.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux