Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: introduce hog properties with less ambiguity

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:56 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
but not active
> > know if there is a good reason not to go with active/inactive.
>
> Linus: So we're already 3 out of 3 who would like active/inactive better
> than asserted/deasserted. I'm curious about your preference, too.

I suppose it depends on where you come from. In electronics
the terms asserted/deasserted is commonly used and
that is where I'm coming from. Maybe just the materials
I've been subjected to, who knows.

Yours,
Linus Walleij