Re: [PATCH v2 16/21] ipmi: kcs_bmc: Add a "raw" character device interface

["Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, at 14:47, Zev Weiss wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:27:47AM CDT, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >The existing IPMI chardev encodes IPMI behaviours as the name suggests.
> >However, KCS devices are useful beyond IPMI (or keyboards), as they
> >provide a means to generate IRQs and exchange arbitrary data between a
> >BMC and its host system.
> >
> >Implement a "raw" KCS character device that exposes the IDR, ODR and STR
> >registers to userspace via read() and write() implemented on a character
> >device:
> >
> >+--------+--------+---------+
> >| Offset | read() | write() |
> >+--------+--------+---------+
> >|   0    |   IDR  |   ODR   |
> >+--------+--------+---------+
> >|   1    |   STR  |   STR   |
> >+--------+--------+---------+
> >
> >This interface allows userspace to implement arbitrary (though somewhat
> >inefficient) protocols for exchanging information between a BMC and host
> >firmware. Conceptually the KCS interface can be used as an out-of-band
> >machanism for interrupt-signaled control messages while bulk data
> 
> Typo ("mechanism")

Ack.

> 
> >transfers occur over more appropriate interfaces between the BMC and the
> >host (which may lack their own interrupt mechanism, e.g. LPC FW cycles).
> >
> >poll() is provided, which will wait for IBF or OBE conditions for data
> >reads and writes respectively. Reads of STR on its own never blocks,
> >though accessing both offsets in the one system call may block if the
> >data registers are not ready.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/dev-raw-kcs |  25 ++
> > drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig             |  17 +
> > drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile            |   1 +
> > drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.c  | 443 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 486 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/dev-raw-kcs
> > create mode 100644 drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.c
> >
> >diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/dev-raw-kcs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/dev-raw-kcs
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 000000000000..06e7e2071562
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/dev-raw-kcs
> >@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> >+What:		/dev/raw-kcs*
> >+Date:		2021-02-15
> >+KernelVersion:	5.13
> >+Contact:	openbmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >+Contact:	openipmi-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >+Contact:	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@xxxxxxxx>
> >+Description:	``/dev/raw-kcs*`` exposes to userspace the data and
> >+		status registers of Keyboard-Controller-Style (KCS) IPMI
> >+		interfaces via read() and write() syscalls. Direct
> >+		exposure of the data and status registers enables
> >+		inefficient but arbitrary protocols to be implemented
> >+		over the device. A typical approach is to use KCS
> >+		devices for out-of-band signalling for bulk data
> >+		transfers over other interfaces between a Baseboard
> >+		Management Controller and its host.
> >+
> >+		+--------+--------+---------+
> >+		| Offset | read() | write() |
> >+		+--------+--------+---------+
> >+		|   0    |   IDR  |   ODR   |
> >+		+--------+--------+---------+
> >+		|   1    |   STR  |   STR   |
> >+		+--------+--------+---------+
> >+
> >+Users:		libmctp: https://github.com/openbmc/libmctp
> >diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
> >index bc5f81899b62..273ac1a1f870 100644
> >--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
> >+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Kconfig
> >@@ -137,6 +137,23 @@ config IPMI_KCS_BMC_CDEV_IPMI
> > 	  This support is also available as a module. The module will be
> > 	  called kcs_bmc_cdev_ipmi.
> >
> >+config IPMI_KCS_BMC_CDEV_RAW
> >+	depends on IPMI_KCS_BMC
> >+	tristate "Raw character device interface for BMC KCS devices"
> >+	help
> >+	  Provides a BMC-side character device directly exposing the
> >+	  data and status registers of a KCS device to userspace. While
> >+	  KCS devices are commonly used to implement IPMI message
> >+	  passing, they provide a general interface for exchange of
> >+	  interrupts, data and status information between the BMC and
> >+	  its host.
> >+
> >+	  Say YES if you wish to use the KCS devices to implement
> >+	  protocols that are not IPMI.
> >+
> >+	  This support is also available as a module. The module will be
> >+	  called kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.
> >+
> > config ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC
> > 	depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
> > 	depends on REGMAP && REGMAP_MMIO && MFD_SYSCON
> >diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
> >index fcfa676afddb..c8cc248ddd90 100644
> >--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
> >+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/Makefile
> >@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IPMI_WATCHDOG) += ipmi_watchdog.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IPMI_POWEROFF) += ipmi_poweroff.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IPMI_KCS_BMC) += kcs_bmc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_IPMI_KCS_BMC_CDEV_IPMI) += kcs_bmc_cdev_ipmi.o
> >+obj-$(CONFIG_IPMI_KCS_BMC_CDEV_RAW) += kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_BT_IPMI_BMC) += bt-bmc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ASPEED_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_aspeed.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_NPCM7XX_KCS_IPMI_BMC) += kcs_bmc_npcm7xx.o
> >diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.c
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 000000000000..bdd258648c8e
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc_cdev_raw.c
> >@@ -0,0 +1,443 @@
> >+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> >+/* Copyright (c) 2021 IBM Corp. */
> >+
> >+#include <linux/delay.h>
> >+#include <linux/device.h>
> >+#include <linux/errno.h>
> >+#include <linux/fs.h>
> >+#include <linux/list.h>
> >+#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> >+#include <linux/module.h>
> >+#include <linux/poll.h>
> >+
> >+#include "kcs_bmc_client.h"
> >+
> >+#define DEVICE_NAME "raw-kcs"
> >+
> >+struct kcs_bmc_raw {
> >+	struct list_head entry;
> >+
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_client client;
> >+
> >+	wait_queue_head_t queue;
> >+	u8 events;
> >+	bool writable;
> >+	bool readable;
> >+	u8 idr;
> >+
> >+	struct miscdevice miscdev;
> >+};
> >+
> >+static inline struct kcs_bmc_raw *client_to_kcs_bmc_raw(struct kcs_bmc_client *client)
> >+{
> >+	return container_of(client, struct kcs_bmc_raw, client);
> >+}
> >+
> >+/* Call under priv->queue.lock */
> >+static void kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv, u8 mask, u8 state)
> >+{
> >+	kcs_bmc_update_event_mask(priv->client.dev, mask, state);
> >+	priv->events &= ~mask;
> >+	priv->events |= state & mask;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int kcs_bmc_raw_event(struct kcs_bmc_client *client)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv;
> >+	struct device *dev;
> >+	u8 status, handled;
> >+
> >+	priv = client_to_kcs_bmc_raw(client);
> >+	dev = priv->miscdev.this_device;
> >+
> >+	spin_lock(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	status = kcs_bmc_read_status(client->dev);
> >+	handled = 0;
> >+
> >+	if ((priv->events & KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF) && (status & KCS_BMC_STR_IBF)) {
> >+		if (priv->readable)
> >+			dev_err(dev, "Storm brewing!");
> 
> That seems a *touch* cryptic...

Uh, yeah. That wasn't meant to be there in that form.

> 
> >+
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Disabling IDR events for back-pressure\n");
> >+		kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF, 0);
> >+		priv->idr = kcs_bmc_read_data(client->dev);
> >+		priv->readable = true;
> >+
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "IDR read, waking waiters\n");
> >+		wake_up_locked(&priv->queue);
> >+
> >+		handled |= KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	if ((priv->events & KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE) && !(status & KCS_BMC_STR_OBF)) {
> >+		kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE, 0);
> >+		priv->writable = true;
> >+
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "ODR writable, waking waiters\n");
> >+		wake_up_locked(&priv->queue);
> >+
> >+		handled |= KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	spin_unlock(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	return handled ? KCS_BMC_EVENT_HANDLED : KCS_BMC_EVENT_NONE;
> 
> Hm, if we're just treating it as a boolean here, is there any need to
> muck around with setting specific bits of 'handled' in the if-blocks
> above?

I don't think it matters? If we want to debug we can print the handled bitmask.

> 
> >+}
> >+
> >+static const struct kcs_bmc_client_ops kcs_bmc_raw_client_ops = {
> >+	.event = kcs_bmc_raw_event,
> >+};
> >+
> >+static inline struct kcs_bmc_raw *file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(struct file *filp)
> >+{
> >+	return container_of(filp->private_data, struct kcs_bmc_raw, miscdev);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int kcs_bmc_raw_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv = file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(filp);
> >+
> >+	return kcs_bmc_enable_device(priv->client.dev, &priv->client);
> >+}
> >+
> >+static bool kcs_bmc_raw_prepare_obe(struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv)
> >+{
> >+	bool writable;
> >+
> >+	/* Enable the OBE event so we can catch the host clearing OBF */
> >+	kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE);
> >+
> >+	/* Now that we'll catch an OBE event, check if it's already occurred */
> >+	writable = !(kcs_bmc_read_status(priv->client.dev) & KCS_BMC_STR_OBF);
> >+
> >+	/* If OBF is clear we've missed the OBE event, so disable it */
> >+	if (writable)
> >+		kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE, 0);
> >+
> >+	return writable;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static __poll_t kcs_bmc_raw_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv;
> >+	__poll_t events = 0;
> >+
> >+	priv = file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(filp);
> >+
> >+	poll_wait(filp, &priv->queue, wait);
> >+
> >+	spin_lock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+	if (kcs_bmc_raw_prepare_obe(priv))
> >+		events |= (EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
> >+
> >+	if (priv->readable || (kcs_bmc_read_status(priv->client.dev) & KCS_BMC_STR_IBF))
> >+		events |= (EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
> >+	spin_unlock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	return events;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static ssize_t kcs_bmc_raw_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
> >+			     size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_device *kcs_bmc;
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv;
> >+	bool read_idr, read_str;
> >+	struct device *dev;
> >+	u8 idr, str;
> >+	ssize_t rc;
> >+
> >+	priv = file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(filp);
> >+	kcs_bmc = priv->client.dev;
> >+	dev = priv->miscdev.this_device;
> >+
> >+	if (!count)
> >+		return 0;
> >+
> >+	if (count > 2 || *ppos > 1)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	if (*ppos + count > 2)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	read_idr = (*ppos == 0);
> >+	read_str = (*ppos == 1) || (count == 2);
> >+
> >+	spin_lock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+	if (read_idr) {
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Waiting for IBF\n");
> >+		str = kcs_bmc_read_status(kcs_bmc);
> >+		if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) && (str & KCS_BMC_STR_IBF)) {
> >+			rc = -EWOULDBLOCK;
> >+			goto out;
> >+		}
> >+
> >+		rc = wait_event_interruptible_locked(priv->queue,
> >+						     priv->readable || (str & KCS_BMC_STR_IBF));
> >+		if (rc < 0)
> >+			goto out;
> >+
> >+		if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >+			dev_dbg(dev, "Interrupted waiting for IBF\n");
> >+			rc = -EINTR;
> >+			goto out;
> >+		}
> >+
> >+		/*
> >+		 * Re-enable events prior to possible read of IDR (which clears
> >+		 * IBF) to ensure we receive interrupts for subsequent writes
> >+		 * to IDR. Writes to IDR by the host should not occur while IBF
> >+		 * is set.
> >+		 */
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Woken by IBF, enabling IRQ\n");
> >+		kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF,
> >+					      KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF);
> >+
> >+		/* Read data out of IDR into internal storage if necessary */
> >+		if (!priv->readable) {
> >+			WARN(!(str & KCS_BMC_STR_IBF), "Unknown reason for wakeup!");
> >+
> >+			priv->idr = kcs_bmc_read_data(kcs_bmc);
> >+		}
> >+
> >+		/* Copy data from internal storage to userspace */
> >+		idr = priv->idr;
> >+
> >+		/* We're done consuming the internally stored value */
> >+		priv->readable = false;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	if (read_str) {
> >+		str = kcs_bmc_read_status(kcs_bmc);
> >+		if (*ppos == 0 || priv->readable)
> >+			/*
> >+			 * If we got this far with `*ppos == 0` then we've read
> >+			 * data out of IDR, so set IBF when reporting back to
> >+			 * userspace so userspace knows the IDR value is valid.
> >+			 */
> >+			str |= KCS_BMC_STR_IBF;
> >+
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Read status 0x%x\n", str);
> >+
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	rc = count;
> >+out:
> >+	spin_unlock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	if (rc < 0)
> >+		return rc;
> >+
> >+	/* Now copy the data in to the userspace buffer */
> >+
> >+	if (read_idr)
> >+		if (copy_to_user(buf++, &idr, sizeof(idr)))
> >+			return -EFAULT;
> >+
> >+	if (read_str)
> >+		if (copy_to_user(buf, &str, sizeof(str)))
> >+			return -EFAULT;
> >+
> >+	return count;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static ssize_t kcs_bmc_raw_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
> >+			      size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_device *kcs_bmc;
> >+	bool write_odr, write_str;
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv;
> >+	struct device *dev;
> >+	uint8_t data[2];
> >+	ssize_t result;
> >+	u8 str;
> >+
> >+	priv = file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(filp);
> >+	kcs_bmc = priv->client.dev;
> >+	dev = priv->miscdev.this_device;
> >+
> >+	if (!count)
> >+		return count;
> >+
> >+	if (count > 2)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	if (*ppos >= 2)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	if (*ppos + count > 2)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	if (copy_from_user(data, buf, count))
> >+		return -EFAULT;
> >+
> >+	write_odr = (*ppos == 0);
> >+	write_str = (*ppos == 1) || (count == 2);
> >+
> >+	spin_lock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	/* Always write status before data, we generate the SerIRQ by writing ODR */
> >+	if (write_str) {
> >+		/* The index of STR in the userspace buffer depends on whether ODR is written */
> >+		str = data[*ppos == 0];
> >+		if (!(str & KCS_BMC_STR_OBF))
> >+			dev_warn(dev, "Clearing OBF with status write: 0x%x\n", str);
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Writing status 0x%x\n", str);
> >+		kcs_bmc_write_status(kcs_bmc, str);
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	if (write_odr) {
> >+		/* If we're writing ODR it's always the first byte in the buffer */
> >+		u8 odr = data[0];
> >+
> >+		str = kcs_bmc_read_status(kcs_bmc);
> >+		if (str & KCS_BMC_STR_OBF) {
> >+			if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
> >+				result = -EWOULDBLOCK;
> >+				goto out;
> >+			}
> >+
> >+			priv->writable = kcs_bmc_raw_prepare_obe(priv);
> >+
> >+			/* Now either OBF is already clear, or we'll get an OBE event to wake us */
> >+			dev_dbg(dev, "Waiting for OBF to clear\n");
> >+			wait_event_interruptible_locked(priv->queue, priv->writable);
> >+
> >+			if (signal_pending(current)) {
> >+				kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE, 0);
> >+				result = -EINTR;
> >+				goto out;
> >+			}
> >+
> >+			WARN_ON(kcs_bmc_read_status(kcs_bmc) & KCS_BMC_STR_OBF);
> >+		}
> >+
> >+		dev_dbg(dev, "Writing 0x%x to ODR\n", odr);
> >+		kcs_bmc_write_data(kcs_bmc, odr);
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	result = count;
> >+out:
> >+	spin_unlock_irq(&priv->queue.lock);
> >+
> >+	return result;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int kcs_bmc_raw_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv = file_to_kcs_bmc_raw(filp);
> >+
> >+	kcs_bmc_disable_device(priv->client.dev, &priv->client);
> >+
> >+	return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static const struct file_operations kcs_bmc_raw_fops = {
> >+	.owner          = THIS_MODULE,
> >+	.open		= kcs_bmc_raw_open,
> >+	.llseek		= no_seek_end_llseek,
> >+	.read           = kcs_bmc_raw_read,
> >+	.write          = kcs_bmc_raw_write,
> >+	.poll		= kcs_bmc_raw_poll,
> >+	.release	= kcs_bmc_raw_release,
> >+};
> >+
> >+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kcs_bmc_raw_instances_lock);
> >+static LIST_HEAD(kcs_bmc_raw_instances);
> >+
> >+static int kcs_bmc_raw_attach_cdev(struct kcs_bmc_device *kcs_bmc)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv;
> >+	int rc;
> >+
> >+	priv = devm_kzalloc(kcs_bmc->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> >+	if (!priv)
> >+		return -ENOMEM;
> >+
> >+	priv->client.dev = kcs_bmc;
> >+	priv->client.ops = &kcs_bmc_raw_client_ops;
> >+
> >+	init_waitqueue_head(&priv->queue);
> >+	priv->writable = false;
> >+	priv->readable = false;
> >+
> >+	priv->miscdev.minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR;
> >+	priv->miscdev.name = devm_kasprintf(kcs_bmc->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s%u", DEVICE_NAME,
> >+					   kcs_bmc->channel);
> >+	if (!priv->miscdev.name)
> >+		return -EINVAL;
> >+
> >+	priv->miscdev.fops = &kcs_bmc_raw_fops;
> >+
> >+	/* Initialise our expected events. Listen for IBF but ignore OBE until necessary */
> >+	kcs_bmc_raw_update_event_mask(priv, (KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF | KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE),
> >+				      KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF);
> >+
> >+	rc = misc_register(&priv->miscdev);
> >+	if (rc) {
> >+		dev_err(kcs_bmc->dev, "Unable to register device\n");
> >+		return rc;
> >+	}
> >+
> >+	spin_lock_irq(&kcs_bmc_raw_instances_lock);
> >+	list_add(&priv->entry, &kcs_bmc_raw_instances);
> >+	spin_unlock_irq(&kcs_bmc_raw_instances_lock);
> >+
> >+	dev_info(kcs_bmc->dev, "Initialised raw client for channel %d", kcs_bmc->channel);
> >+
> >+	return 0;
> >+}
> >+
> >+static int kcs_bmc_raw_detach_cdev(struct kcs_bmc_device *kcs_bmc)
> >+{
> >+	struct kcs_bmc_raw *priv = NULL, *pos;
> >+
> >+	spin_lock_irq(&kcs_bmc_raw_instances_lock);
> >+	list_for_each_entry(pos, &kcs_bmc_raw_instances, entry) {
> >+		if (pos->client.dev == kcs_bmc) {
> >+			priv = pos;
> >+			list_del(&pos->entry);
> >+			break;
> >+		}
> >+	}
> >+	spin_unlock_irq(&kcs_bmc_raw_instances_lock);
> >+
> >+	if (!priv)
> >+		return 0;
> 
> Similarly to patch #12, might we want to indicate some sort of failure
> here, or is this a normal/expected case?

I replied on 12/21, I'll have another think about it.

Cheers,

Andrew