On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 23:24 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:20 PM Sander Vanheule < > sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 19:57 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:51 PM Sander Vanheule > > > <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 15:08 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:11 PM Sander Vanheule < > > > > > sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > > > > > + return swab32(readl(ctrl->base + > > > > > > REALTEK_GPIO_REG_ISR)); > > > > > > > > > > Why swab?! How is this supposed to work on BE CPUs? > > > > > Ditto for all swabXX() usage. > > > > > > > > My use of swab32/swahw32 has little to do with the CPU being BE > > > > or > > > > LE, > > > > but more with the register packing in the GPIO peripheral. > > > > > > > > The supported SoCs have port layout A-B-C-D in the registers, > > > > where > > > > firmware built with Realtek's SDK always denotes A0 as the first > > > > GPIO > > > > line. So bit 24 in a register has the value for A0 (with the > > > > exception > > > > of the IMR register). > > > > > > > > I wrote these wrapper functions to be able to use the BIT() macro > > > > with > > > > the GPIO line number, similar to how gpio-mmio uses ioread32be() > > > > when > > > > the BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER flag is used. > > > > > > > > For the IMR register, port A again comes first, but is now 16 > > > > bits > > > > wide > > > > instead of 8, with A0 at bits 16:17. That's why swahw32 is used > > > > for > > > > this register. > > > > > > > > On the currently unsupported RTL9300-series, the port layout is > > > > reversed: D-C-B-A. GPIO line A0 is then at bit 0, so the swapping > > > > functions won't be required. When support for this alternate port > > > > layout is added, some code will need to be added to differentiate > > > > between the two cases. > > > > > > Yes, you have different endianess on the hardware level, why not to > > > use the proper accessors (with or without utilization of the above > > > mentioned BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER)? > > > > The point I was trying to make, is that it isn't an endianess issue. > > I > > shouldn't have used a register with single byte values to try to > > illustrate that. > > > > Consider instead the interrupt masking registers. To write the IMR > > bits > > for port A (GPIO 0-7), a 16-bit value must be written. This value > > (e.g. > > u16 port_a_imr) is always BE, independent of the packing order of the > > ports in the registers: > > > > // On RTL8380: port A is in the upper word > > writew(port_a_imr, base + OFFSET_IMR_AB); > > > > // On RTL9300: port A is in the lower word > > writew(port_a_imr, base + OFFSET_IMR_AB + 2); > > > > I want the low GPIO lines to be in the lower half-word, so I can > > manipulate GPIO lines 0-15 with simple mask and shift operations. > > > > It just so happens, that all registers needed by bgpio_init contain > > single-byte values. With BGPIO_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER the port order > > is > > reversed as required, but it's a bit of a misnomer here. > > How many registers (per GPIO / port) do you have? > Can you list them and show endianess of the data for each of them and > for old and new hardware (something like a 3 column table)? Each GPIO bank, with 32 GPIO lines, consists of four 8-line ports. There are seven registers per port, but only five are used: | | Data | RTL8380 | RTL9300 Reg | Offset | type | byte order | byte order -------+--------+---------+------------+----------- DIR | 0x08 | 4 * u8 | A-B-C-D | D-C-B-A DATA | 0x0C | 4 * u8 | A-B-C-D | D-C-B-A ISR | 0x10 | 4 * u8 | A-B-C-D | D-C-B-A IMR_AB | 0x14 | 2 * u16 | A-A-B-B | B-B-A-A IMR_CD | 0x18 | 2 * u16 | C-C-D-D | D-D-C-C The unused other registers are all 4*u8. A-B-C-D means: (A << 24) | (B << 16) | (C << 8) | D A-A-B-B means: (A << 16) | B -- Best, Sander