On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:42 PM Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > v7: introduce changes suggested by Rob Herring. If Rob is happy with the bindings like this (GPIO as parallel node rathern than subnode) I am ready to merge this. As long as the bindings are OK I am pretty sure any remaining nits can be fixed in-tree. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:13:56 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20210315114214.3096-1-noltari@gmail.com>
- References: <20210315114214.3096-1-noltari@gmail.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
- Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- References:
- [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
- [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: mockup: Drop duplicate NULL check in gpio_mockup_unregister_pdevs()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: mockup: Adjust documentation to the code
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v7 21/22] dt-bindings: add BCM6318 GPIO sysctl binding documentation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v7 00/22] pinctrl: add BCM63XX pincontrol support
- Index(es):
 |