On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:22 AM Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't know how to make the transition, but can you please revert this > patch, to avoid breaking compatibility with DTBs out there? OK reverted for now. Does this imply I cannot apply Shawn's ACPI support patch either? I.e. is this a prerequisite? Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:36:01 +0100
- In-reply-to: <YEqmTUXbn0T2dqla@builder.lan>
- References: <20210303131858.3976-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <CACRpkdZp7m0s+6Fgzq4ScftAr-CtEPtAbz3jGCvKTzdqXJtfAA@mail.gmail.com> <YEqmTUXbn0T2dqla@builder.lan>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- From: Bjorn Andersson
- Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- References:
- [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- From: Shawn Guo
- Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- From: Bjorn Andersson
- [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: ti: fix error return code of ti_iodelay_probe()
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: core: Set ret to 0 when group is skipped
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: support gpio_chip .set_config call
- Index(es):
 |