On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 06:14:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 4:22 PM Bartosz Golaszewski > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:02 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On STM32MP1, the GPIO banks are subnodes of pin-controller@50002000, > > > see arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi. The driver for > > > pin-controller@50002000 is in drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c > > > and iterates over all of its DT subnodes when registering each GPIO > > > bank gpiochip. Each gpiochip has: > > > > > > - gpio_chip.parent = dev, > > > where dev is the device node of the pin controller > > > - gpio_chip.of_node = np, > > > which is the OF node of the GPIO bank > > > > > > Therefore, dev_fwnode(chip->parent) != of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node), > > > i.e. pin-controller@50002000 != pin-controller@50002000/gpio@5000*000. > > > > > > The original code behaved correctly, as it extracted the "gpio-line-names" > > > from of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node) = pin-controller@50002000/gpio@5000*000. > > > > > > To achieve the same behaviour, read property from the firmware node. ... > > Did you run the OF unit tests on this? The check for the parent dev > > was added after a bug was reported that was only triggered in unit > > tests. > > Parent is not used anymore. But I can run unittests next week (or if > you know that they are failing now, can you please show the failure?). For the record: [ 40.587868] ### dt-test ### end of unittest - 190 passed, 0 failed If you have tests failed, we need more information about what line fails, etc. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko