On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 12:54:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > In IRQ handler interrupts are already disabled, hence no need > to repeat it. Even in the threaded case, which is disabled here, > it is not a problem because IRQ framework serializes descriptor > handling. Remove disabling IRQ part in the handler. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 13:18:09 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20210304105432.36544-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20210304105432.36544-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 03/15] pinctrl: bcm: add bcm63xx base code
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: intel: No need to disable IRQs in the handler
- Index(es):
 |