On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:35 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type > of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks way better like this, with your follow-up fix folded in: Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:11:08 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20210302153451.50593-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References: <20210302153451.50593-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: support override broken GPIO number in ACPI table
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] gpiolib: Unify the checks on fwnode type
- Next by thread: [PATCH] gpio: regmap: fix direction register check
- Index(es):
 |