Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:35 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When IRQ domain is created for an ACPI case, the name of it becomes unknown-%d
> since for now it utilizes of_node member only and doesn't consider fwnode case.
> Convert IRQ domain creation code to utilize fwnode instead.
>
> Before/After the change on Intel Galileo Gen 2 with two GPIO (IRQ) controllers:
>
>   unknown-1     ==>     \_SB.PCI0.GIP0.GPO
>   unknown-2     ==>     \_SB.NIO3
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This first part seems to do what you want,

> @@ -1457,9 +1457,9 @@ static int gpiochip_add_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>                                 struct lock_class_key *lock_key,
>                                 struct lock_class_key *request_key)
>  {
> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(&gc->gpiodev->dev);

(...)

But this:

> @@ -1504,15 +1497,14 @@ static int gpiochip_add_irqchip(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>                         return ret;
>         } else {
>                 /* Some drivers provide custom irqdomain ops */
> -               if (gc->irq.domain_ops)
> -                       ops = gc->irq.domain_ops;
> -
> -               if (!ops)
> -                       ops = &gpiochip_domain_ops;
> -               gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_add_simple(np,
> -                       gc->ngpio,
> -                       gc->irq.first,
> -                       ops, gc);
> +               ops = gc->irq.domain_ops ?: &gpiochip_domain_ops;
> +               if (gc->irq.first)
> +                       gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_legacy(fwnode, gc->ngpio,
> +                                                                 gc->irq.first, 0,
> +                                                                 ops, gc);
> +               else
> +                       gc->irq.domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, gc->ngpio,
> +                                                                 ops, gc);

This looks like a refactoring and reimplementation of irq_domain_add_simple()?

Why, and should it rather be a separate patch?

Yours,
Linus Walleij