Re: [libgpiod][PATCH 0/3] licensing: try to get licensing right

[Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 2:02 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This series tries to improve the licensing situation of libgpiod before we
> proceed with v2.0.
>
> The first patch is rather uncotroversial: it makes the project compliant
> with the REUSE v3.0 specification.
>
> Next two patches propose to change the licenses for certain files:
> non-library source files are relicensed under GPL-2.0-or-later while C++
> library code's license is upgraded to LGPL-3.0-or-later.
>
> The only person other than myself who contributed significant code to the
> relicensed files is Kent Gibson (Cc'ed) so these patches will need his
> ack.
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
>   licensing: make the project REUSE-compliant
>   licensing: relicense non-library code under GPL-2.0-or-later
>   licensing: relicense C++ library code under LGPL-3.0-or-later

LooksGoodToMe thanks for paying so much attention to detail here,
licenses give me migraine.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij