Hint: don't forget to include reviewers from previous version On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 7:52 PM Alban Bedel <alban.bedel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From a quick glance at various datasheets the PCAL6524 and the > PCAL6534 seems to be the only chips in this family that support > setting the drive mode of single pins. Other chips either don't > support it at all, or can only set the drive mode of whole banks, > which doesn't map to the GPIO API. > > Add a new flag, PCAL65xx_REGS, to mark chips that have the extra > registers needed for this feature. Then mark the needed register banks > as readable and writable, here we don't set OUT_CONF as writable, > although it is, as we only need to read it. Finally add a function > that configures the OUT_INDCONF register when the GPIO API sets the > drive mode of the pins. ... > +#define PCAL65xx_REGS BIT(10) Can we have it as a _TYPE, please? ... > +#define PCAL65xx_BANK_INDOUT_CONF BIT(8 + 12) IND is a bit ambiguous based on the description below. After you elaborate, I probably can propose better naming. ... > + * - PCAL65xx with individual pin configuration > + * Individual pin output config 0x40 + 12 * bank_size RW Not sure I understand what "individual" means here (no, I haven't looked into the datasheet). ... > + if (config == PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN) > + val = mask; > + else if (config == PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL) > + val = 0; > + else > + return -EINVAL; Switch-case will look more naturally here (despite being longer in terms of LOCs). ... > +exit: exit_unlock: > + mutex_unlock(&chip->i2c_lock); > + return ret; ... > +#define OF_L65XX(__nrgpio) OF_953X(__nrgpio, PCA_LATCH_INT | PCAL65xx_REGS) When you change to the type, it will go accordingly. Don't add LATCH_INT to the macro. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko