On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:15:50PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:47 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:43:57PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > GPL-2.0 license identifier is deprecated, let's use the preferred > > > identifier: GPL-2.0-only. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Hi Kent, Greg, > > > > > > I started working on making libgpiod licensing reuse-compliant and noticed > > > that the reuse-tool is telling me that the GPL-2.0 SPDX identifier in the > > > GPIO uapi header is deprecated. Since I'm required to copy the header > > > verbatim into libgpiod's repository, I think we need to fix that at source > > > first. > > > > > > include/uapi/linux/gpio.h | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > index e4eb0b8c5cf9..3e01ededbf36 100644 > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gpio.h > > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > > -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */ > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note */ > > > > No, there is no need to convert the kernel to the "latest" spdx level, > > when we started out there was no "-only" nonsense (hint no other license > > has that crud), and "GPL-2.0" is a totally valid summary of the license. > > > > So please don't go changing it all in-kernel, that way lies madness. > > Let's finish fixing up ALL kernel files before worrying about what SPDX > > "version" we are at. > > > > But then, the reuse script is telling me: > > Unfortunately, your project is not compliant with version 3.0 of > the REUSE Specification :-( > > because I'm using a deprecated license. :( Go yell at the REUSE people, there's no requirement to have the most recent version of SPDX, is there? :) And if that's the only thing wrong with the project when running 'reuse lint' then you should be happy, no one will complain at all. thanks, greg k-h