Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] gpio: mvebu: pwm fixes and improvements

[Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 5:16 PM Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This series adds a few related fixes to the pwm .apply and .get_state
> callbacks.
>
> The first patch was originally part of the series adding Armada 8K/7K pwm
> support. I split it out to a separate series following review comments from
> Uwe Kleine-König who spotted a few more issues. There is no dependency between
> this and the Armada 8K/7K series.
>
> v5:
>
>   * Drop a patch applied to the gpio tree
>
>   * Fix patch 4/4 description typo (Uwe)
>
>   * Reduce the number of multiplications (Uwe)
>
>   * Add spaces around '+' (Uwe)
>
>   * Use '1ULL' instead of explicit cast to reduce verbosity
>
>   * Add Linus' Reviewed-by tags to patches that are unchanged since v2
>
> v4:
>
>   * Take advantage of zero value being treated as 2^32 by hardware. Rewrite
>     patch 5/5 (Uwe).
>
> v3:
>
>   * Improve patch 3/5 description (Uwe)
>
>   * Add more Reviewed-by tags from Uwe
>
> v2:
>
> Address Uwe Kleine-König comments.
>
>   * Improve patch 1/5 summary line
>
>   * Add more information to patch 1/5 description
>
>   * Add more information to patch 2/5 description
>
>   * Don't round period/duty_cycle up in .apply (patch 3/5)
>
>   * Expand the comment in path 5/5 based on RMK's analysis of hardware
>     behaviour
>
>   * Add Uwe's Reviewed-by tags
>
> Baruch Siach (4):
>   gpio: mvebu: improve pwm period calculation accuracy
>   gpio: mvebu: make pwm .get_state closer to idempotent
>   gpio: mvebu: don't limit pwm period/duty_cycle to UINT_MAX
>   gpio: mvebu: improve handling of pwm zero on/off values
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>

Series applied, thanks a lot for the improvements! And thanks to Uwe
and Russel for the reviews.

Bartosz