Re: [PATCH v11 02/10] pinctrl: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 FPIOA driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/01/23 13:15, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:32:38 PST (-0800), Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> On 2021/01/21 17:25, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Damien,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this looks all right to me.
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's fine with me.  The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to
>>>>> take those as well and I'll drop them?  I don't generally like to drop stuff
>>>>> from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped
>>>>>> then, that better go to the SoC tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's
>>>>> fine.  Just LMK
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Linus,
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch,
>>>> I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch.
>>>
>>> It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to
>>> his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any
>>> risk of collisions in the tree.
>>
>> Sounds good. Thanks !
> 
> I don't see an actual Ack here, but I'm OK taking it.  IIRC there were some
> issues with the DT stuff as well, I don't remember if they got resolved or if I
> should be expecting a v14.

Palmer,

Linus sent a reviewed-by tag (see above).

For the dt-bindings problems, the v13 that I sent already addresses all make
dtbs_check warning and also addresses Rob's comments. The v13 dt-bindings
patches need review, as well as the clk driver patch. Will ping Stephen about
that one.
I will send a v14 only if there are more comments that need to be addressed.



-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux