On 2021/01/23 13:15, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 00:32:38 PST (-0800), Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> On 2021/01/21 17:25, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>>> Hi Damien, >>>>>> >>>>>> this looks all right to me. >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree? >>>>> >>>>> That's fine with me. The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to >>>>> take those as well and I'll drop them? I don't generally like to drop stuff >>>>> from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up. >>>>> >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805 >>>>> >>>>>> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped >>>>>> then, that better go to the SoC tree. >>>>> >>>>> I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's >>>>> fine. Just LMK >>>>> >>>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Linus, >>>> >>>> Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch, >>>> I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch. >>> >>> It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to >>> his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any >>> risk of collisions in the tree. >> >> Sounds good. Thanks ! > > I don't see an actual Ack here, but I'm OK taking it. IIRC there were some > issues with the DT stuff as well, I don't remember if they got resolved or if I > should be expecting a v14. Palmer, Linus sent a reviewed-by tag (see above). For the dt-bindings problems, the v13 that I sent already addresses all make dtbs_check warning and also addresses Rob's comments. The v13 dt-bindings patches need review, as well as the clk driver patch. Will ping Stephen about that one. I will send a v14 only if there are more comments that need to be addressed. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research