Re: [PATCH v11 02/10] pinctrl: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 FPIOA driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 1:15 AM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2021/01/21 3:21, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:33:05 PST (-0800), linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Hi Damien,
> >>
> >> this looks all right to me.
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Shall I apply just this one patch to the pinctrl tree?
> >
> > That's fine with me.  The DT bindings are in riscv/for-next, maybe it's best to
> > take those as well and I'll drop them?  I don't generally like to drop stuff
> > from for-next, but that's probably better than having everything all mixed up.
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=ed3137edb31b86702511e7ad12b4abe8686b6805
> >
> >> I think the line that touches arch/*/Kconfig should be dropped
> >> then, that better go to the SoC tree.
> >
> > I'm OK with you taking them along with my Ack, but if you don't want to that's
> > fine.  Just LMK
> >
> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Linus,
>
> Please let me know which way you want to proceed. If you want to take the patch,
> I will resend without the Kconfig change and move that change to another patch.

It's fine to proceed as is, since Palmer already applied the bindings to
his tree, just apply the pinctrl driver there as well. I don't see any
risk of collisions in the tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux