Hi, On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 4:36 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > this is an impressive patch. > > We definitely need to touch base with Bjorn on this, preferably also > Sboyd. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 6:35 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Fixes: 4b7618fdc7e6 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add irq_enable callback for msm gpio") > > Fixes: 71266d9d3936 ("pinctrl: qcom: Move clearing pending IRQ to .irq_request_resources callback") > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Some mechanics: I just realized that I addressed everyone's comments but yours. Doh! > 1. Does this need to go into stable? Or is current (non-urgent) fine? Or fixes > for v5.10? I.e. required destination. It probably ought to go into stable, but I'll leave it up to you which version of Linux it lands in. I don't personally know if anyone is criticall waiting on this to land upstream. For Chrome OS we're not desperate for it because we've already landed a temporary revert of Maulik's previous patch and the extra clearing of the masked interrupts isn't causing any really visible problems for us. > 2. If it does, should patches 1-3 also go into stable? And are they > prerequisites? Yeah, the last patch requires the previous ones, so they would all need to go into stable together. -Doug