Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] arch: riscv: add board and SoC DT file support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 20:55:32 PST (-0800), yash.shah@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Start board support by adding initial support for the SiFive FU740 SoC
and the first development board that uses it, the SiFive HiFive
Unmatched A00.

Boot-tested on Linux 5.10-rc4 on a HiFive Unmatched A00 board using the
U-boot and OpenSBI.

This patch series is dependent on Zong's Patchset[0]. The patchset also
adds two new nodes in dtsi file. The binding documentation patch
for these nodes are already posted on the mailing list[1][2].

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20201130082330.77268-4-zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/1606714984-16593-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20201126030043.67390-1-zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Changes in v2:
- The dt bindings patch is split into several individual patches.
- Expand the full list for compatible strings in i2c-ocores.txt

Yash Shah (9):
  dt-bindings: riscv: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC
  dt-bindings: spi: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC
  dt-bindings: pwm: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC
  dt-bindings: serial: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740
    SoC
  dt-bindings: gpio: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC
  dt-bindings: i2c: Update DT binding docs to support SiFive FU740 SoC
  riscv: dts: add initial support for the SiFive FU740-C000 SoC
  dt-bindings: riscv: Update YAML doc to support SiFive HiFive Unmatched
    board
  riscv: dts: add initial board data for the SiFive HiFive Unmatched

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/sifive,gpio.yaml      |   4 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-ocores.txt         |   8 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-sifive.yaml        |   9 +-
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml  |   6 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive.yaml          |  17 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/serial/sifive-serial.yaml  |   4 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sifive.yaml        |  10 +-
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/Makefile                |   3 +-
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi         | 293 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts | 253 ++++++++++++++++++
 10 files changed, 590 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu740-c000.dtsi
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unmatched-a00.dts

Thanks, these are on for-next.  There was one checkpatch warning about the
missing ISSI device tree entry, but we already had that in the FU540 so I'm OK
letting it slide.

I'm also not really sure this is the right way to do this sort of thing: most
of the patches here really aren't RISC-V things, they're SiFive SOC things.
Some of these patches have been picked up by other trees, but I just took the
rest.  I'm not all that happy about taking DT bindings for things like GPIO or
PWM bindings, but as they're pretty small I'm OK doing it in this instance.

In the future it would really be better to split these up and land them via
their respectitve trees, rather than trying to do all the SOC stuff over here.
I know that can be a headache, but we have that SOC group for this purpose to
try and keep things a bit more together -- I know it was a while ago and there
really hasn't been much SOC activity on the RISC-V side of things so maybe it
hasn't been that widley discussed, but that was really designed to solve these
sorts of problems.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux