Re: [PATCH 01/23] kernel: irq: irqdescs: warn on spurious IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:44 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:37 PM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> > <info@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> +               if (printk_ratelimit())
> >> +                       pr_warn("spurious IRQ: irq=%d hwirq=%d nr_irqs=%d\n",
> >> +                               irq, hwirq, nr_irqs);
> >
> > Perhaps you missed pr_warn_ratelimit() macro which is already in the
> > kernel for a long time.
>
> pr_warn_ratelimited() which calls printk_ratelimited().

I stand corrected.
Right, that's what I had in mind (actually didn't know that there are variants).

Thanks!

> And see the comment above printk_ratelimit():
>
> /*
>  * Please don't use printk_ratelimit(), because it shares ratelimiting state
>  * with all other unrelated printk_ratelimit() callsites.  Instead use
>  * printk_ratelimited() or plain old __ratelimit().
>  */


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux