Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: Disallow identical line names in the same chip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 1:36 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We need to make this namespace hierarchical: at least do not
> allow two lines on the same chip to have the same name, this
> is just too much flexibility. If we name a line on a chip,
> name it uniquely on that chip.
>
> I don't know what happens if we just apply this, I *hope* there
> are not a lot of systems out there breaking this simple and
> intuitive rule.
>
> As a side effect, this makes the device tree naming code
> scream a bit if names are not globally unique.
>
> I think there are not super-many device trees out there naming
> their lines so let's fix this before the problem becomes
> widespread.
>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

I applied this patch for v5.11 with replacing -EINVAL with -EEXIST
as suggested by Andy.

Yours,
Linus Walleij



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux