On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:13 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:07 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:52 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > These are the patches I collected over this release cycle. Nothing all > > > too exciting - mainly just updates to drivers and refactoring of the > > > core code. Please pull. > > > > Nice! > > > > But I get a merge conflict in gpiolib-acpi.c! Since I said Andy should > > be maintaining that file it makes me a bit nervous. > > > > It looks like this: > > > > index 6cc5f91bfe2e,23fa9df8241d..000000000000 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c > > @@@ -586,6 -526,40 +586,43 @@@ static bool acpi_get_driver_gpio_data(s > > return false; > > } > > Strange, I didn't see any conflicts in next... > > > > > ++<<<<<<< HEAD > > ++======= > > + static enum gpiod_flags > > + acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio) > > + { > > + switch (agpio->io_restriction) { > > + case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_INPUT: > > + return GPIOD_IN; > > + case ACPI_IO_RESTRICT_OUTPUT: > > + /* > > + * ACPI GPIO resources don't contain an initial value for the > > + * GPIO. Therefore we deduce that value from the pull field > > + * instead. If the pin is pulled up we assume default to be > > + * high, if it is pulled down we assume default to be low, > > + * otherwise we leave pin untouched. > > + */ > > + switch (agpio->pin_config) { > > + case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLUP: > > + return GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; > > + case ACPI_PIN_CONFIG_PULLDOWN: > > + return GPIOD_OUT_LOW; > > + default: > > + break; > > + } > > + break; > > This break is the only thing I have in my tree. Andy told me to take > that patch with his ack. It seems you don't have this function in your > tree - was it moved at some point? Hm yeah I have a bunch of ACPI things I pulled from Andy in my tree. I can try just -3 I guess. I assume the function shall be there. Yours, Linus Walleij