On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:04 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Here's a bunch of fixes for you. They're rebased on top of v5.10-rc6 because > the gpio-zynq patch depends on a function that's been merged this release > cycle but post rc1. Thanks! Pulled into my fixes branch. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.10-rc7
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.10-rc7
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 09:15:31 +0100
- In-reply-to: <20201203100448.17201-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References: <20201203100448.17201-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- References:
- [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.10-rc7
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.10-rc7
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mxs: Remove unused .id_table support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH V2] pinctrl: falcon: add missing put_device() call in pinctrl_falcon_probe()
- Previous by thread: [GIT PULL] gpio: fixes for v5.10-rc7
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/3] drivers: gpio: bt8xx: prefer dev_err()/dev_warn() over of raw printk
- Index(es):
 |