Re: [PATCH 16/18] i2c: i2c-core-base: Use the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() in i2c_set_dev_name()

[Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/11/2020 17:12, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> From: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> To make sure the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() always reflects the name of i2c
>> devices sourced from ACPI, use it in i2c_set_dev_name().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I'd squash this with 15/18, which would make it clear there's a memory
> leak :-)

Ah - that was sloppy...switched from devm_ and forgot to go fix that.
I'll add the kfree into i2c_unregister_device() and squash to 15/18

>> ---
>> Changes since RFC v3:
>>
>> 	- Patch introduced
>>
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> index 573b5da145d1..a6d4ceb01077 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
>> @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static void i2c_dev_set_name(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (adev) {
>> -		dev_set_name(&client->dev, "i2c-%s", acpi_dev_name(adev));
>> +		dev_set_name(&client->dev, i2c_acpi_dev_name(adev));
>>  		return;
>>  	}
>>  
>