[PATCH v1 1/1] gpiolib: Don't free if pin ranges are not defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Edmond Chung <edmondchung@xxxxxxxxxx>

A similar check was added in gpiochip_generic_request, but not in free.
This has caused an imbalance count of request vs. free calls to the
pinctrl driver. This patch is targeted to fix that issue.

Fixes: 2ab73c6d8323 ("gpio: Support GPIO controllers without pin-ranges")
Signed-off-by: Edmond Chung <edmondchung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Chant <achant@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will McVicker <willmcvicker@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 089ddcaa9bc6..6e3c4d7a7d14 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -1806,6 +1806,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_generic_request);
  */
 void gpiochip_generic_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL
+	if (list_empty(&gc->gpiodev->pin_ranges))
+		return;
+#endif
+
 	pinctrl_gpio_free(gc->gpiodev->base + offset);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_generic_free);
-- 
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux