Re: [PATCH][next] gpiolib: acpi: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 6:51 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:46 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:08 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> > > through to the next case.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > index 6cc5f91bfe2e..e37a57d0a2f0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> > > @@ -233,6 +233,7 @@ acpi_gpio_to_gpiod_flags(const struct acpi_resource_gpio *agpio, int polarity)
> > >                 default:
> > >                         break;
> > >                 }
> > > +               break;
> > >         default:
> > >                 break;
> > >         }

> Are you taking it through your tree?

I don't  have anything else, so please proceed directly. That's why I
gave the tag.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko