Re: Request for pre-review of pending MID removal patch series

[Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:02:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 4:43 PM Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:59:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > +Cc: Mika
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:07 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > There is a pending patch series [1] to remove a lot of legacy code
> > > > related to old Intel MID platforms. (Note, not all of them, since we
> > > > have an ACPI based Intel Edison edition which continue working nicely
> > > > after this)
> > > >
> > > > Most of the code is shuffling arch/x86 and the series is quite
> > > > dependent on the contents of that folder (for the sake of
> > > > bisectability). Since that the only way it would be integrated is
> > > > through the tip tree I would like to have your preliminary review on
> > > > other contents — #3 and #4 are PDx86 and GPIO subsystems. In this case
> > > > I won't resend this many times.
> > > >
> > > > I have a preliminary offline agreement with Len Brown on SFI removal
> > > > (#2 in the list).
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://gitlab.com/andy-shev/next/-/commits/topic/mid-removal/
> >
> > Looks pretty good to me.
> 
> Thanks! Can I use your tag (which is better?) for some patches (which ones?)?

Aren't you going to submit this series for real review at some point? I
can then formally review some of the patches.

> > I wonder it is possible to remove gma500 also
> > or it is used in Edison?
> 
> It can be used on other platforms based on not-going-to-be-removed
> Merrifield and possibly Moorefield.
> Hence I would like to leave it for now.

OK.