Re: [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 5.11-1

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:58:28PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:31:03AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 10:24:37PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > 
> > > > Thanks! I merged in v5.10-rc4 to the GPIO devel branch and
> > > > pulled in this on top, works like a charm!
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I understood why you merged v5.10-rc4, but in any case thanks,
> > > result is great!
> > 
> > I merged v5.10-rc4 because the pull request says:
> > 
> > > The following changes since commit b72de3ff19fdc4bbe4d4bb3f4483c7e46e00bac3:
> > >
> > >   gpio: sifive: Fix SiFive gpio probe (2020-11-11 09:53:09 +0100)
> > 
> > And that patch was on my fixes branch, which went into v5.10-rc4,
> > so in order to have the base commit in the devel tree I had to merge
> > in v5.10-rc4.
> 
> I based solely on your gpio/for-next as has been stated in the cover letter.
> So, the PR might have been applied on top of your gpio/for-next without any
> additional merge required.
> 
> I admit that PR automatic text is a bit deviated (it has been taken from wrong
> base, note that tag is correct nevertheless). I will look forward to amend my

"information in the tag"

> scripts.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko