Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFT: gpio: tegra186: Set affinity callback to parent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus, Thierry,

On 2020-11-13 21:44, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 03:06:28PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
This assigns the .irq_set_affinity to the parent callback.
I assume the Tegra186 is an SMP system so this would be
beneficial.

I used the pattern making the hirerarchy tolerant for missing
parent as in Marc's earlier patch.

Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
index 9500074b1f1b..5060e81f5f49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra186.c
@@ -444,6 +444,16 @@ static int tegra186_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
 	return 0;
 }

+static int tegra186_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
+				     const struct cpumask *dest,
+				     bool force)
+{
+	if (data->parent_data)
+		return irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(data, dest, force);
+
+	return 0;

Having come to my senses, this should definitely return an error when
there is no parent is present (i.e. we can't claim success when the
affinity hasn't changed).

+}
+
 static void tegra186_gpio_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
 {
 	struct tegra_gpio *gpio = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
@@ -690,6 +700,7 @@ static int tegra186_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	gpio->intc.irq_unmask = tegra186_irq_unmask;
 	gpio->intc.irq_set_type = tegra186_irq_set_type;
 	gpio->intc.irq_set_wake = tegra186_irq_set_wake;
+	gpio->intc.irq_set_affinity = tegra186_irq_set_affinity;

 	irq = &gpio->gpio.irq;
 	irq->chip = &gpio->intc;

This does seem to mostly work, but I do get this new warning during
boot:

    [    6.406230] genirq: irq_chip gpio did not update eff. affinity
mask of irq 70

Any idea what that's supposed to mean? I can probably dig in some more
early next week to see if I can track down why exactly that happens.

I can't however reproduce this on my Jetson-TX2. Can you post the content
of /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/70?

Thanks,

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux