On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 12/11/2020 09:39:18+0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > Both the caller and the supplier's source file should have access to > > the include file containing the prototypes. > > > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c:1637:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘at91_pinctrl_gpio_suspend’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 1637 | void at91_pinctrl_gpio_suspend(void) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c:1661:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > 1661 | void at91_pinctrl_gpio_resume(void) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- [...] > > diff --git a/include/soc/at91/pm.h b/include/soc/at91/pm.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..0fd5093f7f73a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/include/soc/at91/pm.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > +/* > > + * atmel platform data > > + */ > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91 > > Shouldn't that be a header guard instead of depending on PINCTRL_AT91 ? I copied the same semantics from the header it was taken from. Happy to turn it into a proper header file too. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog