On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:27:39PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:53:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work. > > Mika, do you think it's a good idea? If it helps the GPIO maintainers work then yes sure, and in that case you can add: Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
- From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:00:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20201111192739.GS4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20201109205332.19592-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201109205332.19592-18-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201111192739.GS4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH v5 00/17] gpiolib: acpi: pin configuration fixes
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v5 00/17] gpiolib: acpi: pin configuration fixes
- Prev by Date: [pinctrl:devel] BUILD SUCCESS 3603a537bf791d4047b89fd0fc060f723eded458
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/32] riscv: Fix kernel time_init()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 17/17] gpiolib: acpi: Make Intel GPIO tree official for GPIO ACPI work
- Index(es):
 |