Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Fix msm9853 Kconfig entry to depend on, not select PINCTRL_MSM

[John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:33 AM Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/10/2020 12:32 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:29 AM Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/10/2020 12:00 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> >>> One fixup following my patch commit be117ca32261 ("pinctrl:
> >>> qcom: Kconfig: Rework PINCTRL_MSM to be a depenency rather then
> >>> a selected config") being queued in LinusW's tree, as a new
> >>> config entry was added for the msm9853 that also needs the
> >>> change.
> >>>
> >>> Applies to LinusW's pinctrl devel tree.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Vladimir Lypak <junak.pub@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>    drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> >>> index 8bdf878fe970c..cf56e029cd9c7 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ config PINCTRL_MSM8916
> >>>    config PINCTRL_MSM8953
> >>>        tristate "Qualcomm 8953 pin controller driver"
> >>>        depends on GPIOLIB && OF
> >>> -     select PINCTRL_MSM
> >>> +     depends on PINCTRL_MSM
> >>>        help
> >>>          This is the pinctrl, pinmux, pinconf and gpiolib driver for the
> >>>          Qualcomm TLMM block found on the Qualcomm MSM8953 platform.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Subject should indicate msm8953, no?
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, I'm confused. :)
> > The subject is "pinctrl: qcom: Fix msm9853 Kconfig..." is there
> > something more specific you are suggesting?
>
> Yes, that is the current subject.  Yet you are changing a Kconfig for
> msm8953.
>
> msm9853 != msm8953
>
> Infact I'm not sure msm9853 is something that actually exists....

Ah! Apologies! My brain flipped it reading it each time. Will fix that up.

thanks
-john