On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:09 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 05:04:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:55:51PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > We can simplify the code in gpio-exar by using regmap. This allows us to > > > drop the mutex (regmap provides its own locking) and we can also reuse > > > regmap's bit operations instead of implementing our own update function. > > > > ... > > > > > +static const struct regmap_config exar_regmap_config = { > > > + .name = "exar-gpio", > > > + .reg_bits = 16, > > > > As per previous version comment. > > > > Hold on, the registers are 16-bit wide, but their halves are sparsed! > > So, I guess 8 and 8 with helpers to get hi and lo parts are essential. > > > > > > TABLE 5: DEVICE CONFIGURATION REGISTERS SHOWN IN BYTE ALIGNMENT > > > > > + .val_bits = 8, > > > +}; > > > > This is basically represents two banks out of 6 8-bit registers each. > > ...which makes me wonder if gpio-regmap can be utilized here... > But the address width won't affect the actuall accessing of 8 bits registers in an mmio regmap. Internally the mmio regmap does pretty much the same thing the previous driver did: call readb()/writeb() on 8-bit "chunks" of the banks. Bartosz