From: Andy Shevchenko > Sent: 02 November 2020 10:59 > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:23 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > +static unsigned int > > +exar_offset_to_sel_addr(struct exar_gpio_chip *exar_gpio, unsigned int offset) > > +{ > > + return (offset + exar_gpio->first_pin) / 8 ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_HI > > + : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOSEL_LO; > > +} > > + > > +static unsigned int > > +exar_offset_to_lvl_addr(struct exar_gpio_chip *exar_gpio, unsigned int offset) > > +{ > > + return (offset + exar_gpio->first_pin) / 8 ? EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI > > + : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO; > > +} > > + > > +static unsigned int > > +exar_offset_to_bit(struct exar_gpio_chip *exar_gpio, unsigned int offset) > > +{ > > + return (offset + exar_gpio->first_pin) % 8; > > +} > > Answering to your question... > > It can be done line this: > > static unsigned int exar_offset_to_bank_and_bit(..., *bit) > { > *bit = (offset + exar_gpio->first_pin) % 8; > return (offset + exar_gpio->first_pin) / 8; > } That is likely to require the compiler reload exar_gpio->first_pin after the write to *bit. > static unsigned int exar_offset_to_lvl_addr_and_bit(, *bit) > { > return exar_offset_to_bank_and_bit(..., bit) ? > EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_HI : EXAR_OFFSET_MPIOLVL_LO; > } Gah why is it using divide then ?: ? AFAICT (from the above) there are at most 16 pins. Much better would be using: tmp = offset + exar_gpio->first_pin; *bit = tmp & 7; return tmp & 8; Inlined the compiler may well compute: exar_offset_to_bank_and_bit() ? HI : LO; as: LO + (HI - LO) * exar_offset_to_bank_and_bit(). The latter term is likely to be just (tmp & 8) >> n. I also bet the code actually wants (1 << bit). David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)