[PATCH v2 2/3] Documentation: firmware-guide: gpio-properties: active_low only for GpioIo()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It appears that people may misinterpret active_low field in _DSD
for GpioInt() resource. Add a paragraph to clarify this.

Reported-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: added Rb tag (Mika)
 Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
index e6e65ceb2ca1..370fe46c6af9 100644
--- a/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
+++ b/Documentation/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.rst
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ Since ACPI GpioIo() resource does not have a field saying whether it is
 active low or high, the "active_low" argument can be used here.  Setting
 it to 1 marks the GPIO as active low.
 
+Note, active_low in _DSD does not make sense for GpioInt() resource and
+must be 0. GpioInt() resource has its own means of defining it.
+
 In our Bluetooth example the "reset-gpios" refers to the second GpioIo()
 resource, second pin in that resource with the GPIO number of 31.
 
-- 
2.28.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux