Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] Documentation: firmware-guide: gpio-properties: active_low only for GpioIo()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 7:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:55 PM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 3:45 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:10:42PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > ActiveLevel field is described in 19.6.55 GpioInt (GPIO Interrupt Connection
> > > Resource Descriptor Macro).
> > >
> > > > Without using the active_low, how can we describe  a pin that is
> > > > active low and has to trigger an irq on both edges?
> > >
> > > This is nonsense.
> > > What does it mean?
> >
> > Let me try to explain myself again:
> >
> > I have a gpio pin that produces IRQs on both edges. so ActiveLevel is Both
> >
> > The problem is that the value of that pin is inverted: Low means 1 and
> > high means 0.
> >
> > How can I describe that the pin "is inverted" without using the _DSD field?
>
> "Both edges" and "inverted" or "polarity low" in one sentence make no sense.

To be on the constructive side, I can *imagine* so badly designed
hardware that uses level and edge at the same time, but before I go to
conclusions, can you share relevant (pieces of) datasheet?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux