On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 05:26:51PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:03 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 10:39 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:17:15AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject should be prefixed with [libgpiod] according to the README ;). > > > > > > > > > > Oh come on! :) > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > If you replace the gpiod_line_bulk_iter_foreach_line() here with > > > > manually looping over the bulk lines then everything from A to B above > > > > can be dropped. > > > > > > > > > > Something is telling me that dedicated iterators are more elegant. But > > > I guess we can do everything manually for now and see about that > > > later. Fair enough, I'll drop it. > > > > > > > Good thing I'm here to let you know that little voice is wrong :). > > > > I've got a couple of commits in my working tree[1] that apply to your > > patch and drop the iters as I've suggested if you'd like to compare. > > > > Cheers, > > Kent. > > > > [1] https://github.com/warthog618/libgpiod/commits/for-v2 > > Would you mind if I squashed those changes into my patch? > Not at all. Cheers, Kent.