On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 6:58 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Use named item instead of plain integer for enum gpiod_flags > to make it clear that even 0 has its own meaning. > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: no changes > drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > index 2f895a2b8411..892a513b7a64 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c > @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_parse_own_gpio(struct device_node *np, > > xlate_flags = 0; > *lflags = GPIO_LOOKUP_FLAGS_DEFAULT; > - *dflags = 0; > + *dflags = GPIOD_ASIS; > > ret = of_property_read_u32(chip_np, "#gpio-cells", &tmp); > if (ret) > -- > 2.28.0 > This patch doesn't seem to depend on the others in this series so I applied it to my tree. Let me know if that's not the case. I'll let you take the ACPI patches. Bartosz