On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 08:14:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:34 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 03:21:47PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bartosz Golaszewski > > > <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > > > I am waiting for Kent to respin them addressing Andy's comments > > > on patch 5/5 then they can go in as fixes I think. > > > > > > > I had replied to Andy's comments - I'm prefer with my version than his > > suggestion: > > > > "I'm not keen on that alternative as what it suggests is actually a > > pointer comparison, and even if the user realizes that they may instead > > use "strlen(label) == 0", when they shouldn't be assuming that a null > > terminator is present in the array. I avoided mentioning "string" and > > kept it in terms of the char array for the same reason." > > My point is to make documentation less cryptic (= less programming > language stylish). > If you can rephrase it that way - nice! Otherwise, I leave this to Linus. > I agree with your point - including code snippets should be a last resort. But sometimes that is the most effective way to do it. Cheers, Kent.