On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:21 PM Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I need to expose to the userspace a GPIO, physically connected to a > > board > > > > push-button. This GPIO must expose a pre-defined name, such as > > > > "user-push-button", so that the userspace applications can use it > > without > > > > know any physical GPIO details. > > > > > > > > I can customize the board BIOS and so my goal is to add an ACPI table > > with > > > > a content like this: > > > > > > > > ... > > > > Scope (\_SB.GPO1) > > > > { > > > > Device (BTNS) > > > > { > > > > Name (_HID, "PRP0001") > > > > Name (_DDN, "GPIO buttons device") > > > > > > > > Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () > > > > { > > > > GpioIo ( > > > > Exclusive, // Not shared > > > > PullNone, // No need > > for pulls > > > > 0, // Debounce > > timeout > > > > 0, // Drive > > strength > > > > IoRestrictionInputOnly, // Only used > > as input > > > > "\\_SB.GPO1", // GPIO > > controller > > > > 0, ResourceConsumer, , ) // Must be 0 > > > > { > > > > 25, // GPIO > > number > > > > } > > > > ... > > > > > > > > I know that this GPIO can be used from other drivers. > > > > For example I successfully tested it using the "gpio-keys" device > > driver, > > > > giving to my GPIO a key-code and emulating in this way a keyboard key. > > > > This could be a possible solution. > > > > > > > > But I prefer to expose my GPIO as a classic GPIO, not as a keyboard > > key. > > > > > > > > I was wondering if there is a generic GPIO driver that I can use to > > expose > > > > this GPIO with its pre-defined name (caming from the ACPI table > > declaration), > > > > to the userspace... > > > > Unfortunately what you are describing in the second part is rather > > property of the controller which can hog the line, but this is not > > what you want in the first part. > > The Linux kernel, in many ways, is designed that you need a driver > > (I²C user space device node is rather a mistake, but compromise for > > that time when most of the devices have access from user space > > drivers). So, the proper way is to define this as gpio-keys (either > > interrupt version or polling one) and connect a listener to the event. > > > > Summarize: you need to describe pin(s) via "gpio-line-names" property > > of the controller (it's not so easy task if ACPI tables already have > > parts of it, but I think your case should be feasible). And either > > provide a gpio-keys device, or use line directly by name as (libgpiod > > example): > > gpiodetect > > gpioinfo gpiochipX > > gpiofind $GPIO_LINE_NAME > > gpiomon gpiochipX $(gpiofind $GPIO_LINE_NAME) & > > > > Examples of ACPI are here [1] for controller part (look at the name > > list) and for device part [2]. You may look into other folders as > > well, though they are not so reach of examples. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi/blob/master/recipes-bsp/acpi- > > tables/samples/edison/arduino.asli > > [2]: https://github.com/westeri/meta-acpi/blob/master/recipes-bsp/acpi- > > tables/samples/edison/buttons.asli > > I have already written and ACPI table, not in the BIOS but as separate > SSDT, loaded manually at runtime, using the gpio-keys (with interrupt) > and in this way all works good. So I have already tested this solution. > > But I prefer obtain this result in the classic way, with GPIO... > > So I think I'll write a device driver for it. A device driver which > reads the ACPI table and publishes the GPIO, with its name, in sysfs... Maybe I was not so clear, but as Bart mentioned the least you can do is simply define line name via "gpio-line-names" property. The problem here is when and how you would like to have them incorporated. When: if ACPI tables are being provided by firmware which you may not alter, then you must use initramfs type of solution (no configfs, don't know about EFI var though). How: In that case you might have a chance to incorporate _DSD() method into *existing* _CRS() one. Possible impediments: if ACPI table from firmware already has a _DSD() defined or above is not working for some reason. In such a case you must upgrade entire DSDT via initramfs. > > > Adding Andy who knows ACPI GPIO well. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > In general, the "gpio-line-names" property is used for that and it's > > > supported both for device tree as well as ACPI, although I have only > > > ever used the former. > > > > Right. ACPI supports properties via _DSD() method. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko