On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:50:51AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:41 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:34 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +/** > > > + * struct gpio_v2_line_attribute - a configurable attribute of a line > > > + * @id: attribute identifier with value from &enum gpio_v2_line_attr_id > > > + * @padding: reserved for future use and must be zero filled > > > + * @flags: if id is GPIO_V2_LINE_ATTR_ID_FLAGS, the flags for the GPIO > > > + * line, with values from enum gpio_v2_line_flag, such as > > > + * GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_ACTIVE_LOW, GPIO_V2_LINE_FLAG_OUTPUT etc, OR:ed > > > + * together. This overrides the default flags contained in the &struct > > > + * gpio_v2_line_config for the associated line. > > > + * @values: if id is GPIO_V2_LINE_ATTR_ID_OUTPUT_VALUES, a bitmap > > > + * containing the values to which the lines will be set, with each bit > > > + * number corresponding to the index into &struct > > > + * gpio_v2_line_request.offsets. > > > + * @debounce_period_us: if id is GPIO_V2_LINE_ATTR_ID_DEBOUNCE, the desired > > > + * debounce period, in microseconds > > > + */ > > > +struct gpio_v2_line_attribute { > > > + __u32 id; > > > + __u32 padding; > > > + union { > > > + __aligned_u64 flags; > > > + __aligned_u64 values; > > > + __u32 debounce_period_us; > > > + }; > > > +}; > > > > Having different-sized members in the union makes it hard for > > something like strace to print the contents. How about just making > > them all __aligned_u64 even when 32 bits are sufficient? > > > > Ah yes, adding support for GPIO ioctl()'s to strace has been on my > TODO list for 3 years now. :( > Great - you beat me to it - I was going to ask if we could fix strace ;-). If it can be taught the id/union semantics I'd rather do that, so we could then also format the 64-bit values appropriately. e.g. flags and values are both bitmaps but the bits are interpreted very differently. Cheers, Kent.