On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:49 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:36 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > /* > > * ABI v1 > > + * > > + * This version of the ABI is deprecated and will be removed in the future. > > + * Use the latest version of the ABI, defined above, instead. > > */ > > How intentional is the wording here? It seems unrealistic that the v1 ABI > would be removed any time soon if there are existing users and applications > cannot yet rely on v2 to be present in all kernels, so it sounds like a hollow > threat. I have similar thoughts when commenting on previous versions of this piece. > At the same time I can see that telling users it will be removed can lead to > them moving on to the new version more quickly, so maybe a hollow threat > is in fact appropriate here ;-) Users all know that if something will be broken, they may escalate to Linus T. and get things reverted. So, above depends on the user's knowledge about the process. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko